Jesus saith: I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. John 14:6
Search
About
Bureaucrats in the EU have forced us to show you this message to comply with newly instituted GDPR policies. The reason is to monitor ALL of your internet activities.
När du postar en kommentar sparar vi information om din IP-adress, webbläsare, namn eller alias och allt du skriver i kommentarsfältet. Om du skriver en e-postadress och en hemsida-adress sparas detta också. Den kommentar du postar kommer publiceras på Internet. För att skriva en kommentar måste du först godkänna att den publiceras.
When posting a comment, we will save information about your IP address, browser, name or alias, and anything you write in the comment field. If you enter an email address and a website address, this is also saved. The comment you post will be published on the Internet. To post a comment, you must first approve it to be published. Sverige/Sweden
Mitt uppdrag som kristen är att rädda människor för evigheten.
"Den Laglöses ankomst är ett verk av Satan och sker med stor makt, falska tecken och under 10 och med orättfärdighetens alla konster, som bedrar dem som går i fördärvet – de har ju inte velat ta emot den kärlek till sanningen som kunde ha räddat dem. 11 Därför låter Gud villfarelsen få makt över dem så att de tror på lögnen 12 och blir dömda, alla dessa som inte har trott på sanningen utan har valt orättfärdigheten." 2 Tess. 9-12
"Satan deceiveth the whole world" Revelation 12:9
There never can be any true peace—while sins are unforgiven. The sinner with his life's sin unforgiven, can never have true peace. He is sleeping over a volcano. But when sin is forgiven—there is peace with God.
Den gången fick hans röst jorden att skaka, men nu har han lovat och sagt: Än en gång ska jag skaka inte bara jorden utan också himlen. Hebreerbrevet 12:26
"Judarna dödade Herren Jesus liksom de dödade profeterna, och oss har de förföljt. De trotsar Gud och är fiender till hela mänskligheten." 1 Tess. 2:15
"Modern Zionism is not possible without the Christian Zionism" -- Netanyahu
Greg Felton; America is now fully controlled by Zionists.
And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORD, and shall not find it.Amos 8:12
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
"He that has My Commandments and keeps them, he it is that loves Me." John 14:21
"Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism." - Rabbi S. Wise
“Utrotningen av kristna är ett nödvändigt offer” -Talmud, Zohar, Shemoth
"Even the best of the goyim should be killed." - Rabbi ben Yohai
Would you address 1 Corinthians 7:15? Does desertion by a non-believing mate grant the abandoned Christian the right of remarriage?
In First Corinthians, chapter 7, the apostle Paul responds to a number of questions that had been submitted to him by various members of the church at Corinth (cf. 1 Cor. 7:1). Some of these queries had to do with the relationship of a believer who is married to an unbeliever.
For example, should a Christian leave his or her unbelieving spouse? Paul’s answer was in the negative — not if the unbeliever is content to keep on dwelling with the Christian (1 Cor. 7:12-13). The “sanctified” environment of a home in which the influence of the gospel is found could lead to the conversion of the heathen partner (1 Cor. 7:14; cf. 1 Pet. 3:1).
But what if the unbeliever should not be content to remain with the Christian, and he “departs” (chorizetai, literally “separates himself”)? What should the Christian do? Paul says that the child of God “is not under bondage” in such cases (1 Cor. 7:15).
Some have argued that First Corinthians 7:15 provides a second cause for divorce (in addition to the “fornication” of Matthew 5:32; 19:9), and so, by implication, expands Jesus’ teaching, and authorizes a subsequent remarriage on the ground of “desertion” by an unbelieving mate. This view is commonly called the “Pauline privilege.”
The theory certainly is not a new one. It was advocated by Chrysostom (c. A.D. 347-407), one of the so-called “church fathers.” It became a part of Roman Catholic Canon law and was defended by Martin Luther. This view, we are convinced, is unwarranted and constitutes a compromise of the Lord’s teaching on divorce and remarriage.
0 comments | Post a comment | Comments RSS
Post a comment